|
THE
CALTECH OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:
Making
Friends and Start-Ups
by Fred Farina
Spring
2002
PDF
| Table of Contents | Go
to Bottom of this Page
|

Members
of the Office of Technology Transfer (left to right): Penny
Wolfe, Traci Arnold, Melinda Bakarbessy, Bob Gallagher,
Larry Gilbert, Scott Carter, Rich Wolf, Liz Olson, Fred
Farina.
|
Ten
thirty on a sunny Tuesday morning. A handful of yellow leaves
on Holliston Avenue. The first signs of a timid Southern California
autumn. The San Gabriel Mountains decide to join us today. The
haze temporarily lifts. It's a good day. Professor Smith and one
of his doctoral students, Sarah, pass by Human Resources walking
decisively. They can see the mountains in front of them. Their
destination: the Office of Technology Transfer (OTT). Their mission:
a start-up. Their secret dream: the next Microsoft. Their reality
check: Larry Gilbert. Their best ally: OTT Director Larry Gilbert.
L
arry's assistant, Penny, announces the visitors.
Larry gets off the phone. He was talking to a VC. He greets Professor
Smith and Sarah with a nonchalant, "What have you got?" Smith
replies, "a funded company." The news arrived this morning,
his start-up has received funding to the tune of $5 million. This
day is getting even better.
Because
Caltech only took a small equity position in the company, the
founders, Professor Smith and Sarah, were able to retain substantial
ownership. Together with the management team they have put in
place with the help of OTT, they will embark on the development
of a competitive product while valiantly leading the company to
a possible IPO or maybe an acquisition. Smith and Sarah are glad
they have been disclosing their inventions to OTT over the years.
They are happy OTT aggressively filed patent applications to protect
their inventions, provided advice and guidance through the start-up
process, gave them a fair licensing deal for the patent rights
owned by Caltech, introduced them to top venture capitalists,
and referred competent professionals such as lawyers and accountants
so critical in the early stage of a start-up. In fact, they are
really glad they came to OTT, and today they are here to share
their success.
Nice
story. Very nice story. And not that uncommon. Every year, five
to ten start-ups get off the ground hoping to successfully commercialize
Caltech/JPL technology. OTT's involvement includes negotiating
a licensing deal, as well as fully assisting the young company
in all aspects of the start-up process.
Beyond
start-ups, OTT is involved in a multitude of activities revolving
around the transfer of technology developed at Caltech and JPL
to the commercial sector. Despite OTT's young age (it was founded
in 1995), Caltech has become a nationwide leader in the transfer
of university-based technology, ranking near the top in the number
of technologies disclosed and licenses executed every year. OTT
consists of nine members known as the "Otters," including
five licensing professionals and four administrative staff. The
activities of the office can be divided into four main categories:
- Identifying
promising technologies and evaluating their com mercial
viability.
- Selecting
inventions which warrant patent protection and managing
the patent portfolio (this responsibility is shared with
the Office of Intellectual Property Counsel).
- Negotiating
and drafting license agreements with commercial companies.
- Fostering
start-ups and assisting Caltech entrepreneurs.
|
These
activities embody the four main facets of the Institute's philosophy
on technology transfer.
The
first aspect of this philosophy relates to building and maintaining
relationships with faculty and other inventors in order to maximize
the influx of invention disclosures. The office takes particular
care to create a friendly and non-bureaucratic environment in
which inventors feel comfortable about reporting new inventions
and regard the process as painless, almost fun. To this end, Otters
routinely meet with faculty and other technologists, discuss their
research, and solicit their input. Aside from making the work
more interesting for the Otters as they actively interact with
our distinguished faculty, this strategy has resulted in a dramatic
increase in the number of inventions disclosed to the Institute.
In 1995, less than 80 inventions were disclosed; in 2001 the office
received more than 160 invention disclosures.
Protecting
the Institute's intellectual property is a central OTT responsibility.
The general approach is one whereby inventions are evaluated for
their commercial viability, and patent applications are filed
for those which are deemed to have the potential to be successful
in the marketplace. In particular, market trends are identified,
areas of technology in high demand are determined, and invention
disclosures which relate to these technologies are aggressively
protected using the patent system. In order to efficiently implement
this strategy, the Otters stay abreast of the trends by monitoring
areas of high market demand and constantly researching promising
areas of technology. Strategically limiting the number of patent
applications filed to those inventions that have the potential
to generate royalties greatly reduces the high cost of developing
and maintaining a strong patent portfolio.

Then
there is licensing strategy. Here, the difficulty is to determine
whether the technology at hand would have the best chance to quickly
and profitably reach the marketplace if licensed to a larger company,
a medium size corporation, or a start-up. To accommodate differences
between this wide range of licensees, license agreements are tailored
to the needs of the licensee and may include royalties only, equity
only, or a combination of both, in exchange for the transfer of
intellectual property.
By
investigating which technologies are being pursued by major corporations,
it is possible to identify the inventions that are best suited
for a strict royalty licensing deal with a large company. Using
as an example a single patent covering a therapeutic, it would
be costly and inefficient to base a start-up entirely on this
invention, while a large pharmaceutical company will have the
resources and expertise to develop a drug, bring it to market,
and generate revenues. On the other hand, a group of patents covering
a certain area of technology, such as optical switching, may best
be licensed to a start-up. Indeed, a substantial patent portfolio
will attract investors, and the start-up will devote all of its
resources to the development of a competitive product. At a large
company, technology development opportunities often abound, and
certain technologies may be left on the shelf in favor of more
profitable pursuits. Additionally, historical data from Caltech
and other leading universities also show that revenues generated
from equity deals with small businesses are second only to a few
large royalty deals with major corporations. Unless a technology
is clearly best suited for a "strict royalty/large company" licensing
deal, OTT will first consider equity opportunities with start-ups,
and then explore licensing opportunities with established companies
if the elements of a start-up are not present.
Caltech
has become a nationwide leader in the transfer of university-based
technology, ranking near the top in the number of technologies
disclosed and licenses executed every year.
All
things considered, the "two bites of the apple" approach informs
everything OTT does. By fostering entrepreneurial activities of
the inventors, creating a friendly environment for entrepreneurs,
providing support, contacts, and valuable services to start-ups,
and allowing entrepreneurs to hold large equity positions in companies,
OTT is earning the trust and support of Caltech innovators. In
addition to the direct impact on the Institute's community, the
region benefits from the high-tech industry growth generated by
Caltech's entrepreneurial activities. This reflects well on the
Institute, and also produces prosperous entrepreneurs who will
remember the role Caltech played in their success and will likely
give back to the Institute. This concept is what is referred to
as "two bites of the apple," the first bite being the equity consideration
in the company for the license, and the second being the charitable
donation. Caltech has already been the beneficiary of charitable
gifts of stock from Umachines and Codegrok, largely because of
OTT's role in their early development.
|

Plot
1 illustrates the number of invention disclosures received,
patents issued, and licenses completed at Caltech, Stanford,
and MIT over fiscal year 2000.

Plot
2 illustrates the patent expenditures relative to revenues
at Caltech, Stanford, and MIT over fiscal year 2000.

Plot
3 illustrates the number of campus invention disclosures
received (JPL not included).
|

In
the future, OTT hopes to increase the number of start-ups created
every year while securing a number of high-revenue royalty deals.
This can be realized only with the help of Caltech/JPL inventors
and entrepreneurs. Otters always welcome inquiries and are happy
to assist with issues relating to the patent and licensing process,
start-up information, business contacts and referrals to professionals,
or any other technology-transfer related questions.
It's
spring and two winters have passed since Professor Smith and his
student received their first round of funding. Much has happened.
Positive things for the most part. Several Caltech students joined
the company after graduation and the company's Pasadena offices
have expanded. A second round of funding came in last year and
a product has been developed. Today is a defining day for the
company. Smith and Sarah have asked Larry to meet them at the
Ath for dinner. Champagne is on the table. "What have you got
this time?" asks Larry. Hardly containing her excitement, Sarah
jumps in: "Today we signed on our first customer, and the
order is big big big ..." ENG
Fred
Farina, MSEE '92, is a Licensing Associate in the Office of Technology
Transfer.
Go to Top of this Page
PDF
| Table of Contents |
Go to Top of this Page
|